Agent-Based HOL Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the Leo-III project, a new agent-based deduction system for classical higher-order logic is developed. Leo-III combines its predecessor’s concept of cooperating external specialist systems with a novel agent-based proof procedure. Key goals of the system’s development involve parallelism on various levels of the proof search, adaptability for different external specialists, and native support for reasoning in expressive non-classical logics.
منابع مشابه
Going Polymorphic - TH1 Reasoning for Leo-III
While interactive proof assistants for higher-order logic (HOL) commonly admit reasoning within rich type systems, current theorem provers for HOL are mainly based on simply typed λ-calculi and therefore do not allow such flexibility. In this paper, we present modifications to the higher-order automated theorem prover Leo-III for turning it into a reasoning system for rank-1 polymorphic HOL. To...
متن کاملImproving Agent Performance for Multi-Resource Negotiation Using Learning Automata and Case-Based Reasoning
In electronic commerce markets, agents often should acquire multiple resources to fulfil a high-level task. In order to attain such resources they need to compete with each other. In multi-agent environments, in which competition is involved, negotiation would be an interaction between agents in order to reach an agreement on resource allocation and to be coordinated with each other. In recent ...
متن کاملSupporting Reasoning about Functional Programs: An Operational Approach
Some existing systems for supporting reasoning about functional programs have been constructed without first formalising the semantics of the language. This paper discusses how a reasoning system can be built, within the HOL theorem proving environment, based on an operational semantics for the language and using a fully definitional approach. The theoretical structure of the system is based on...
متن کاملHOL based Universal Reasoning
At Unilog’2010 I have proposed classical higher-order logic HOL (Church’s type theory [1,9]) as a uniform framework for combining logics [2]. The main claim has been that many non-classical logics are just natural (embedded) fragments of classical HOL. The approach also supports combinations (e.g. fusions) of embedded logics; in particular, bridge rules can be postulated simply as axioms. In th...
متن کاملCombining WS1S and HOL
We investigate the combination of the weak second-order monadic logic of one successor (WS1S) with higher-order logic (HOL). We show how these two logics can be combined, how theorem provers based on them can be safely integrated, and how the result can be used. In particular, we present an embedding of the semantics of WS1S in HOL that provides a basis for coupling the MONA system, a decision ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016